Colon Cancer Caused by Railroad Work
Exposure to chemicals that are hazardous is a regular occurrence for railroad workers. This has been shown to cause various types of cancer and other serious conditions.
For instance asbestos and diesel exhaust have been linked to colon cancer. It's also been proven that exposure to certain solvents, metal-working fluids and pesticides may increase colon cancer risk.
Exposures
When they are loading or unloading chemicals or cleaning up spills, breathing diesel exhaust or using various solvents, railroad workers are exposed hazardous substances while working. Many of these carcinogens can be linked to cancer or other chronic health conditions. Federal Employers Liability (FELA) provides the railroad workers with cancer or chronic illnesses.
For instance, the widow of a retired railroad employee claimed that her husband's death from stomach cancer linked to asbestos was due to his job as a worker for CSX Transportation Inc. She claims CSX failed to provide adequate safety equipment to safeguard the worker from inhaling asbestos fibers when sanding, washing and painting materials that contained the deadly substance.
union pacific railroad lawsuit involves railroad workers who were exposed to creosote, coal dust and other harmful substances while on the job. These chemicals could cause leukemia and other blood cancers and lung diseases.
Benzene, a toxic chemical, is found in many products used by the railroad. This includes fuel as well as solvents. Studies have linked benzene to various cancers, including colon cancer. A lawyer from the railroad industry can determine whether the illness you're suffering from was triggered due to exposure to dangerous chemicals while working and make a claim on your behalf. Bladder cancer lawsuit limits the time you have to submit claims. Therefore, it is important to talk to a lawyer immediately.
Diagnosis
Railroad workers are exposed numerous toxic chemicals and fumes while working. Asbestos, welding fumes, diesel exhaust and weed killers like Imazethapyr and dicamba can all cause cancer in the colon. Railroad workers who have been diagnosed with a medical condition related to their work may be entitled to compensation through an action under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA).
An experienced railroad injury lawyer can assist you with this claim. FELA was enacted in 1908, and allows railroads to compensate for injuries sustained on the job. This includes injuries like cancer, and it could provide an enormous amount of compensation.
At the end of 2016 a widow in Illinois filed a lawsuit against CSX Transportation Inc. claiming that the company failed to take adequate safety measures to prevent her late husband's death from stomach cancer that metastasized to colon cancer. The plaintiff, Ruth Frieson, claims that her husband's exposure to asbestos and toxins as a result of his work with CSX caused the cancer and his death. In the course of the trial, jurors were presented with expert testimony from two doctors of rehabilitative medicine and industrial hygienists, as well as testimony from the plaintiff's wife, as well as his medical oncologist who claimed that exposure to diesel exhaust, asbestos and a lifetime of smoking contributed to his cancer. However, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant railroad after just under three hours of deliberation.
Treatment
If you've been diagnosed with colon cancer resulting from your railroad job and you've been diagnosed, it's important to seek legal advice right immediately. Under the Federal Employers Liability Act, railroad workers who have been injured may bring a lawsuit within three years of their diagnosis.
A lawsuit against a railroad could be complicated based on the manner in which you were diagnosed with cancer. For example, in some cases, it can be difficult to pinpoint precisely the time and date of exposure to toxic substances since many of these chemicals have a lengthy half-life.
The jury will consider several aspects when determining the amount compensation you could receive for your injury. Loss of income, medical expenses as well as pain and suffering are all elements that the jury will take into account. You may be entitled to wrongful-death damages if your loved one is killed as a result.
In a recent case an ex-railroad worker claimed that he contracted cancer because of his constant exposure on job to diesel exhaust, asbestos, and other toxic chemicals. He claimed that railroads didn't comply with FELA safety standards. The court decided that the plaintiff did not conduct a "reasonably thorough" search for information about his disease. The jury concluded that he did not have enough evidence to prove his claim.
Damages
Railroad workers and residents near railyards are exposed to carcinogenic and toxic substances like asbestos and diesel exhaust. Our Houston railroad exposure lawyer can help you get compensation if you suffered from illnesses related to this exposure. In addition to covering past and future medical expenses, you may be entitled to compensation for the loss of income and expenses for caring. In Bladder cancer lawsuit , you may be able to pursue damages for pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment life, emotional distress, and more.
Our firm was awarded a defense verdict in a Federal Employers' Liability Act case on behalf of the railroad client. The plaintiff alleged that he was diagnosed with Hodgkin's Lymphoma and kidney cancer because of his work-related exposure to creosote diesel exhaust and other toxic substances while working for the railroad as an engineer of locomotives. Leukemia lawsuit returned a verdict for defense after having deliberated for less than one hour.
In another FELA case the lawyers of our firm won a the summary judgment on behalf of the defendant railroad in a lawsuit filed by a former freight train conductor. The lawsuit alleged that he had developed lung cancer as a result of his job on the railroad and was triggered by exposure to asbestos and other toxic substances. We argued that a prior release agreement that was signed in connection with the settlement of his asbestos-related case barred the claim.